Responses of neurons in the lamb nucleus tractus solitarius to stimulation of the caudal oral cavity and epiglottis with different stimulus modalities.

Receptors located in the posterior oral cavity and on the epiglottis play an important role in the initiation of upper airway reflexes such as swallowing, gagging, coughing and apnea. Peripheral nerves which innervate these receptor areas terminate in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS). We have recorded the responses of 61 neurons in the lamb NTS to stimulation of the caudal tongue, palate and epiglottis with mechanical, chemical and thermal stimuli and mapped receptive field location. Although there was some overlap in the areas of the NTS from which neurons with oral cavity and epiglottal receptive fields could be recorded, a significant difference was observed in the mean recording sites of the two groups of neurons. Neurons with oral cavity receptive fields were located more rostral, lateral and ventral in the NTS than neurons with receptive fields on the epiglottis. Little convergence of sensory input onto single cells in the NTS was observed between the oral cavity and the epiglottis. Only one NTS neuron had a receptive field in both of these receptor areas. In contrast, a large number of neurons with oral cavity receptive fields received input from two receptor areas. These neurons had a receptive field on the tongue which was located directly beneath the receptive field on the palate. Mechanical stimuli were the most effective for neurons with either oral cavity or epiglottal receptive fields and thermal stimuli were the least effective. Neurons which responded to mechanical stimuli responded better to a moving stimulus than to a punctate one, and large increases in the strength of a punctate stimulus were required to elicit significant increases in response frequency. Most NTS neurons responded to more than one of the stimulus modalities. However, a significant difference in the mean number of stimulus modalities which elicited responses was observed between neurons with oral cavity and epiglottal receptive fields. The number of multimodal neurons with epiglottal receptive fields was higher than those with oral cavity receptive fields. The multimodal nature of neurons which responded to epiglottal or oral cavity stimulation combined with their location in reflexogenic areas of the NTS suggests that these neurons could be important in the integration of afferent input from the oral cavity and upper airway. If these NTS neurons are involved in the control of oral and upper airway reflexes it would be important for them to respond to as many of the stimulus cues as possible and the majority of these neurons do just that.